Opponents, usually lawyers and left-wing political parties, argued that the arguments would seriously violate the rights of the defence, the long-standing constitutional right to the presumption of innocence, the rights of suspects in custody and the right to a fair trial. – The effectiveness and effectiveness of NAB`s plea- Deal – The News International Author Martin Yant discussed the use of coercion in controversial pleas: Even though the charges are more serious, prosecutors can often still bluff defense attorneys and their clients to plead guilty to a lesser offense. As a result, people who could have been acquitted for lack of evidence, but also who are in fact truly innocent, will often plead guilty. What for? In a word, fear. And the more accusations, the more studies, the greater the fear. This explains why prosecutors sometimes appear to charge the accused.  If the accused believes that the sentence that would be imposed in practice is less than five years` imprisonment (or that it is only a fine), the accused may apply to be tried with the prosecutor. The defendant is rewarded with a reduction in the penalty and has other benefits (z.B.
that the defendant does not pay the taxes of the procedure). The accused must accept the sentence for the counts (although the pleading sentence has some specific points in other compensation proceedings), regardless of the seriousness of the charges.